You first argued that they should not rebalance, which was slippery slope, then when I said they don't have to, you changed your position to them not being able to make smaller changes. And there is ample precedent for them to make that understanding it's not just about what they "think" will happen. ![]() ![]() Why do you keep failing to understand my point? Purists don't trust that they will balance things the way you want them to. The reality is you don't have to rebalance everything to make some useless skills do a little damage for variety. Nobody cares what they "think" will happen. I have played it since the day it came out. Purists don't have any more understanding than I do about the game. You don't seem to understand any of the logical fallacies you keep bringing up, so I'm not really interested in what you have to say. ![]() You are making arguments based on logical fallacy repeatedly.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |